About Me

Saturday, 29 June 2013

Unity in the Church and avoiding Twitter spats...

So I've been thinking this week about what it means to witness for our faith.  We are called to preach the gospel, to show the love of Christ and be Jesus to those around us. Most of us choose to do this in different ways and this is good. God has gifted us all in different ways and through those different gifts we have the ability to reach all people. 

One thing that annoys me about Christian circles is the labelling of people, for example, liberals, evangelicals, conservative evangelicals, charismatics, Anglo-Catholics, theologians, social commentators, and so on... It annoys me because these are just labels, they don't tell you anything about the person themself. On top of that they can be totally misleading, if I describe someone as an Anglo-catholic, that description comes with a set of assumptions about what they believe, how they practice their faith and how they are likely to feel about certain situations or theological view points. Those assumptions are often complete rubbish. As just one example, when I felt called into ministry the first person I spoke to is someone who has regularly been described as an Anglo-Catholic. As a more charismatic believer I assumed a lot about what his reaction would be. In fact I was completely and utterly wrong, he was incredibly encouraging and made no mention of the fact that I was a woman or a charismatic evangelical. In fact it was he who first put me on the road to Ordination.

So why am I going in to all this? Well it's twofold. Firstly because the worldwide church is so broad and vast that it takes in many different viewpoints, theological issues and denominations and yet we are all united in our love of one God. Secondly because as Christians in this vastly differing melee of views and standpoints, we are all representing that God who unites us, to the world at large.

Someone once told me a quote which was attributed to John Wimber, and I've got to be honest I can't find any evidence of that, but it was along the lines of:

You've got to love the whole church, from the smells and bells to the weird and wacky. It's all God's church and who am I to decide which bit is getting it right?

Now as I said I don't know for sure it was Wimber who said it but I do know that it's a great quote! It speaks of unity, and love of God, and of his church. I remind myself of this often, when I am frustrated with a particular part of the church or a particular belief. The truth is if we are going to reach the world with the Gospel we are going to need many different ways of doing it.

So often we see different areas of the church and different people within it getting annoyed with each other publicly. Different ideas are good and debate is certainly healthy but I would really love to see this done in a more loving way. If I find myself speaking to someone holding a different view point to mine I want to find out more - I mean what if they are right and I'm not?! I don't often change my mind on these things but I do like to be challenged because then I find, you can be sure of what you believe, if it has been questioned and yet you are still standing in the same place then your belief becomes stronger.

I admit it, I do like to be challenged, I like a good debate and I hope that I come across as loving in my questions and not arrogant. So I would always encourage others to do the same, to discuss differing views, to look at opposing ideas, but to do so with love and understanding. I have found on several occasions recently Christians in the public eye being less than loving towards one another in the public arena. If you don't agree with each other that's fine, but have some respect for each others position and don't forget that if God has put you in the public eye you can be sure people will be watching closely. The bible says that those in ministry will be judged more harshly and that's a tough calling, and I know many of us make mistakes, after all being a Christian or a leader does not make you perfect, but we just need be aware of who is watching. The church gets slated in the media, especially over anything that divides it, and we have a responsibility to avoid that wherever possible, not add to it.

I love social media, but so often we can be tempted to fire off something online as a response to a problem or personal situation when really our first response should be to seek God, pray and see what the bible says. Many times I have heard the phrase ' and she calls herself a Christian' or 'I thought you were a Christian'. Hardly a good witness is it...

As Christians we all have a responsibility to be salt and light to this world wherever we can, we have a responsibility to walk Gods line and not that of the world, we have a responsibility to show the world that there can be another way to respond. And yes, of course, sometimes we will get it wrong but let's try and make those times as few and far between, as possible.  Let's turn to the bible before responding out of frustration or anger, let's put love first rather than taking offence.






2 comments:

UKViewer said...

I have to agree with your sentiment. Sometimes we can be really uncharitable to others in how we describe them or respond to them. And, like you, I dislike labels, which actually are divisive rather than unifying. And surely unity is something we need to be praying for and aspiring to through every single action we take in the name of Christ.

After some pushing I tried to describe my theological standpoint as Liberal Catholic, but as time goes on, it opens up and becomes wider, broader and more flexible. This seems to me to be about formation which is ongoing and lifelong. If we fail to be formed, than perhaps we've adopted a closed mind and heart, not just to our fellow mankind, but to the Holy Spirit as well.

I notice a conversation going on on twitter about a lack of vocations being used to disguise cuts in stipendiary ministry. I'm sure that those discussing it might have some evidence for their view point, but others are disagreeing because in their diocese, the situation is different. Which goes to show that the church is variable and perhaps not as unified as it likes to think. My own perspective is that there are many coming forward, but for one reason or another, perhaps there isn't enough room for them in the big picture. I'm aware that each diocese has a given number of funding for stipendiary curates, which means that after training, some Ordinands are either surplus to requirements and are 'released to the wider church' as our DDO put it. Meaning that they need to find a title post for themselves, rather than one in their sending diocese. This is far from satisfactory, but might explain some of the difficulties and delays experienced by some in the discernment process. I'm also aware that in some cases spurious reasons might be being used to turn potential Ordinand's away, but I have to trust the system to get it right.

And that's the word which we fail to use so often. Trust each other, from wherever we come from theologically or by tradition and work together for mission and the call to unity which Jesus gave us before the ascension.

Red said...

Thanks UKV. I think I'm the same, I know where I'd palace myself on the scale but at the same time recognising that as time goes on I become more aware of others views and I become more open.

Yes not sure about the whole vocations thing, it is amazing though how different each diocese is - just going to BAP made me realise that, seeing how different others journeys had been so far. It's true thought that some changes are needed...
Hope all is good with you
red x